Determination of Minorities in India – UPSC GS2

Context: Union government has told the Supreme Court (SC) that state governments can now grant minority status to any religious or linguistic community, including Hindus.
Minorities notified by the Government of India:
  • Currently, only those communities notified under section 2(c) of the National Commission of Minority (NCM) Act, 1992, by the central government are regarded as minority.
  • In 1992, with the enactment of the NCM Act, 1992, the Minority Commission became a statutory body and was renamed as the NCM.
  • In 1993, the first Statutory National Commission was set up and five religious communities viz. The Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists and Zoroastrians (Parsis) were notified as minority communities.
  • In 2014, Jains were also notified as a minority community.
What is the Case?
  • The plea contended that Hindus are in a ‘minority’ in six states and three Union Territories of India but were allegedly not able to avail themselves of the benefits of schemes meant for minorities.
  • Plea Showed as per 2011 census Hindus have become a minority in:
    • Lakshadweep (2.5%),
    • Mizoram (2.75%),
    • Nagaland (8.75%),
    • Meghalaya (11.53%),
    • J&K (28.44%),
    • Arunachal Pradesh (29%),
    • Manipur (31.39%), and
    • Punjab (38.40%).
  • They should be given minority status in these states in accordance with the principle laid down by the SC in its 2002 TMA Pai Foundation and 2005 Bal Patil Case ruling.
  • TMA Pai Case:
    • The SC had said that for the purposes of Article 30 that deals with the rights of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions, religious and linguistic minorities have to be considered state-wise.
  • Bal Patil Case:
    • In 2005, the SC in its judgement in ‘Bal Patil’ referred to the TMA Pai ruling.
    • The legal position clarifies that henceforth the unit for determining status of both linguistic and religious minorities would be ‘state’.
  • The petition claimed that NCMEI (National Commission for Minority Education Institution) Act 2004 gives unbridled power to the Centre and is “manifestly arbitrary, irrational, and offending”.
  • Section 2(f) of NCMEI Act 2004 confers power to the Centre to identify and notify minority communities in India.
What is the Centre’s Stand?
  • The Centre said the petitioners’ argument is not correct since states can also “certify institutions as being minority institutions as per the rules of the said state.
  • Parliament and State legislatures have concurrent powers to enact law to provide for the protection of minorities and their interests.
  • Matters such as declaring the followers of Judaism, Bahaism, and Hinduism who are minorities in Ladakh, Mizoram, Lakshadweep, Kashmir, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, Punjab and Manipur can establish and administer educational institutions of their choice in the said state and laying down guideline(s) for identification of minority at state level may be considered by the concerned state governments.
  • The TMA Pai ruling also “reveals that the SC has nowhere eroded the power of the Central Government to notify a community as a ‘minority’.
  • The Parliament was empowered under Article 246 of the Constitution read with Entry 20, “economic and social planning”, of the Concurrent List to enact laws to promote and protect the interests of minorities.
  • Parliament has the legislative competence and the Central government has the executive competence to notify a community as a minority under Section 2(c) of the National Commission for Minorities Act of 1992.
Scroll to Top